This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Walter Burley Griffin is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
I'm building a new Plone website dedicated to all things Walter Burley Griffin at http://wbgriffin.org, and would like to invite all Walter Burley Griffin fans to participate and contribute. The new website can be a great place for things outside of the scope of Wikipedia. So, before perhaps someday listing the site on the external links section of the Walter Burley Griffin page, I would like to first build it into a first-rate repository of Walter Burley Griffin info. Note that ZWiki software is installed, and any member can create their own wiki in their member area, or contribute to site-wide wikis (coming soon).
The article says"During his time there, Griffin designed a series of 60 university buildings." but when discussing extant buildings, only talks of those few in Australia. Does anybody know if some of these Indian university buildings remain? I would think that there is an excellent chance that if they were built, then quite a few would be still standing, given the nature of universities. Pete07:30, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Percy Owen, Federal Director-General of Public Works, was Griffin’s harshest critic. Griffin was never considered to chair the Federal Capital Advisory Committee (FCAC). When Sulman was appointed chair of the FCAC (and not the “Federal Advisory Council” as Birrell stated) he invited Griffin to work with him but Griffin refused because Owen was a member and he could not possibly work with “this man”.
...
Griffin’s euphoria in winning the premier award was doused even before he arrived in Sydney by news that his Canberra design had been superseded by a hybrid plan proposed by a board made up of senior officers of the Public Works Committee. Sulman was not a member of this board but Owen was and so was W. L. Vernon. On 16 October 1913, Griffin was appointed Federal Capital Director of Design and Construction with the principal role of supervising all work to be done on Canberra. His authority disappeared when Parliament accepted the board’s plan, and not his, and approved work to commence on site at once.
In 1914 Sulman, in his capacity as President of the Town Planning Association and as the self-appointed spokesman for the architectural and engineering professions within the Commonwealth, gave evidence at the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works. He strongly urged the powers that be to allow Griffin, as author of the premiated design, to work without any interference and urged “that no alteration be made in the present arrangement by which Mr Griffin is authorised to carry out his own plan, subject to such modifications as he has already made or thinks it desirable to suggest, approve of, or recommend …” (W. B. Griffin, Letter to Prime Minister Hughes, 8 January 1921, Melbourne. MLQ980.2.G, Mitchell Library.)
Griffin had been denigrated terribly from 1922 on. His contract had run out and it wasn’t renewed. Sulman was appointed in his place as chairman of the new Federal Advisory Council and Griffin was asked to work with him. Sulman had started to undermine him before Griffin’s ship arrived in Sydney, and Griffin said, “I can’t work with this man”. It was Sulman who made the statement that did the most damage to Canberra, and that was: “Griffin’s idea of people living on boulevards and walking up and down footpaths was a Continental idea; we would stick with the British where people will have their own backyards and they won’t be walking down the street.” So he converted the whole plan to English garden city rather than a city in its own right.
I have been doing some online research into Griffins work after Canberra. It would be worth mentioning the Griffins' Greater Sydney Development Association (GSDA) and their patented Knitlock prefabricated construction method invented by Griffin in 1917. Also I found a good refernce for the Capitol theatre.--Martyman-(talk)08:52, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Refs:[reply]
I have rewritten/expanded the last section of the article, but I will post here to be picked over before going in to the article because I think some of my prose is a little lack lustre. --Martyman-(talk)02:42, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
In 1919 the Griffins founded the Greater Sydney Development Association (GSDA), and in 1921 purchased 259 ha of land in North Sydney. The GSDA's goal was the development of an idylic community with a consistent architectural feel and [[[The Bush (Australian)||bushland]] setting. Walter Burley Griffin as managing director of the GSDA designed all the buildings built in the area until 1935.
Castlecrag was the first suburb to be developed by the GSDA. Under Griffins control houses in the area where built from locally sourced sandstone and "knitlock" prefabricated concrete. Almost all the houses Griffin designed where small and had flat roofs, and he included an internal coutyard in many of them. Griffin used what was at that time the novel concept of including native bushland in these designs.
Other work Griffin did during this time included the very original Melbourne suburb of Eaglemont. Griffin also helped to design the New South Wales towns Leeton, Griffith and Culburra Beach.
During their time at the GSDA the Griffins became more involved in anthroposophy and in 1935 through contacts in the movement Griffin won a commission to design the library at Lucknow University in India. Griffin left for India in 1935 with his wife following the next year. During his time in India, Griffin designed a series of 60 university buildings. He was still engaged in this when in 1937 he died from peritonitis, following an unsuccessful operation.
It reads well, I'm sure it'll get built on once it's in the article. I normally worry about getting the facts straight before I worry about brilliant prose ;) --nixie03:43, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If you could email it to me at my work email addres that would be great. Standard ANU firstname.lastname@blah.blah
Also the photo mentioned by AYArktos is the first one I have seen that actually shows a building built with knitlock. Even if it isn't used in the article initially it can't hurt to upload it to commons and link to it from here. --Martyman-(talk)11:00, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
JSTOR, in an 1970s article from an obscure historical architecture journal. Sadly most of the papers that come up on a search for Griffin are actually about Frank Lloyd Wright.--nixie11:10, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that's impressive most of the Physics journals I deal with at work only have full text for fairly recent editions. I take it the ANU has a subscription. Which means you should be able to access it from home through the library's reverse proxy. Unless it is one of those poxy password based subscriptions. --Martyman-(talk)11:17, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, that worked. I just found "Notes on W.B. Griffin's "Knitlock" and His architectural Projects for Canberra" which seems to have quite a bit of information. Shame about the image quality though. --Martyman-(talk)11:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You are right the images are resonable in the high res pdf. Not really wikipedia quality though even if we did know the copyright status. I guess WBG's plans will be coming into the public domain in two years, if I remember correctly (life+70). --Martyman-(talk)11:33, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Patents (I'm assuming that includes the images within them) are in the PD, see {{PD-US-patent}}. If you were keen you could probably make a coloured image showing how the different pieces fit together which would probably be easier for the reader to understand.--nixie11:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I have managed to decipher what WBG's diagrams are showing. I still have to add the direction change parts, the roofing system and dimensions. I don't know if I will bother incorporating the 3D isographic view. My diagram looks like this so far. --Martyman-(talk)03:32, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder if we should switch the Canberra map image to the one drawn by Griffin on the Scriviner map. As the one I put on there is Walter's design but the specific representation is his wifes work. --Martyman-(talk)
, but it is hard to see in the thumb (it might just be the laptop), is there an easy way to modifiy the image to make the lines darker?--nixie10:50, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible to just up the contrast in photoshop, but it may reduce the actual amountof detail a little. I will have a look if it helps later today. --Martyman-(talk)20:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a new version of the plan with increased contrast. I think it will look slightly better as a htumbnail. What do you think? If it is not an improvement we can always delete the new version. --Martyman-(talk)23:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.pbs.org/wbgriffin/camber.htm suggests that Griffin's tangles with politicians were in part due to "his public outcry of Australia's involvement in the war [that] caused him to be removed from the Canberra project."?? We haven't really reflected his politics well here - but that he was political, even if somewhat ineptly, might fit with being involved with the society concerned with the single tax system. City planning is of course a very political statement in itself and I recall that Griffin's plan had some sort of People's hall sitting on Capitol Hill, higher than Parliament House.--A Y Arktos20:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
There's a lot more that could be said about the Griffins political views and his plan and the civic/democracy ideas behind it, Griffins struggle to make his plan happen, the political fights, the Royal Commision, Anti-Americanism in the Australian government, the appalling way the Australian's spoke of him and the plan in the press at the time (and how noone likes to remember than now). I'm going to chase some hardcopy sources for this section of the article soon, since they might provide a more balanced/reliable account than information online.--nixie20:42, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Someone asked what I meant by mahor works for the lists - mostly I thought the lists should include buildings/developments that are easy to find information on, that are mentioned in the text, or other major texts as an notable piece of his work.--nixie23:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Can somebody please verify - This article lists Walter Burley Griffin as the inventor of the carport, yet the carport article iteslf lists somebody else.
I just went through the photos included in Maldre's book on WBG, including the Catalog of Griffin's American buildings (in photographs) and saw nothing that looked like a carport. This article also makes a claim about WBG and reinforced concrete that I find diffucult (really, impossible) to believe. I say that both claims GO. Carptrash23:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Quoting from the Carport Intergrity Policy for the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office [1]
As early as 1909, carports were used by the Prairie School architect Walter Burley Griffin in his design for
the Sloan House in Elmhurst, Illinois (Gebhard, 1991: 110). By 1913, carports were also being employed
by other Prairie School architects such as the Minneapolis firm of Purcell, Feick & Elmslie in their design
for a residence at Lockwood Lake, Wisconsin. In this instance, the carport was termed an “Auto Space”
(Gebhard, 1991: 110). The late architectural historian David Gebhard suggested that the term “carport”
originated from the feature’s use in 1930s Streamline Moderne residences (Gebhard, 1991: 107). This term,
which entered popular jargon in 1939, stemmed from the visual connection between these streamlined
residences and nautical imagery.....
In the 1930s through the 1950s, carports were also being used by Frank Lloyd Wright in his Usonian
Houses; an idea that he probably got from Griffin, a former associate.
This is from a Reference of Gebhard, David. “The Suburban House and the Automobile.” The Car and the City: The Automobile, the
Built Environment and Daily Urban Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991: 106
123.
David Gebhard was the author of numerous volumes on the architects and architecture of California. He was the founder and curator of the renowned architectural drawing collection at UCSB.
[2]
So according to this information Walter Burley Griffin was the first known to include the use of the carport in housing design. Boylo06:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So here is a picture of the Sloan Res. That is NOT copyright free so the copytright police will remove it, but it shows what I'd call an attached garage rather than a car port. I hate to argure with David Gebhard, who is my guru, but he's dead so . . . ....Carptrash16:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The carport could have later been enclosed to a garage, its hard to tell how enclosed it is from the photo's angle. But even so, would a copy of the architectural drawing prove that this was originally designed as a carport ? If you look at this photo of the original drawings you will definately see that a carport was designed and not a garage. Hope this renews your faith in David Gebhard [3]
Also just found this photo which proves it was orginally built as a carport at the home (btw this photo was only purchased by the library in 2006, so maybe why it hasnt been found before)
[4]
Here's a first floor plan that also shows it as a carport.
[5]
Carptrash and Boylo, this was an excellent discussion; its the type of thing I would like to see on talk pages more often! -- DS1953talk02:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like Doubting Thomas must have felt when presented with (John 20:24-29) . . ... well, you know what. Boylo's presentation is iron clad, leaving no room for uncertainty. My faith in all that is sacred has been restored. One of the treasures of my library is a copy of Architecture & Ornament in Late 19th Century America from David Gebhard's library. Here is a rubbing of his embossed stamp - Difficult-to-impossible to decipher, but the faithful (restored and otherwise) know what it is. A sacred relic. Life is good. Carptrash14:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is commonly known that W B Griffin was dismissed from his position in Canberra by being handed a dismissal note on New Year's Eve of 1920. He did not resign!!! The source should be checked again.
By the way - W B Griffin was quite hated in Canberra by the politicians who found him too eloquent and too educated (references?). Also, W B Griffin didn't want to follow their ideas - that is why he was fired and Canberra in the end looks more like an English village than a city with boulevards with shops alongside as in Paris (Griffin's vision). LA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.34.140.221 (talk) 03:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Walter Burley Griffin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Griffin was largely under-appreciated during his time in Australia, but since his death recognition of his work has steadily grown. In 1964, when Canberra's central lake was filled, as Griffin had intended, Prime Minister Robert Menzies declined to have the lake named after himself. Instead he named it Lake Burley Griffin, making it the first "monument" in Canberra dedicated to the city's designer ("Burley" was included in the name because of the misconception, which has continued, that it was part of Griffin's surname).
There is nowhere in this article (or the one for Lake Burley Griffin, for that matter) to explain this passage. If the meaning is that "Burley" was his middle name, not surname, perhaps that should be added to the text as a clarification for readers less-familiar with the English-language naming system.
--Vadim Galimov (talk) 12:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=logo}
